Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Skip to:

Table of contents
Current nominations
To be closed
More input needed
Recently closed
Suspended candidates

This star, with one point broken, symbolizes the featured candidates on Wikipedia.

Featured pictures are images that add significantly to articles, either by illustrating article content particularly well, or being eye-catching to the point where users will want to read its accompanying article. Taking the adage that "a picture is worth a thousand words", the images featured on Wikipedia:Featured pictures should illustrate a Wikipedia article in such a way as to add significantly to that article, according to the featured picture criteria.

Promoting an image

If you believe an image should be featured, create a subpage (use the "For Nominations" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

For promotion, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers in support and the consensus is in its favor, it can be added to the Wikipedia:Featured pictures list. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator and/or creator of the image; however, anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets.

All users may comment. However, only those who have been registered on the English Wikipedia for 25 days and with at least 100 edits will be included in the numerical count. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. Nominations started in December are given three extra days, due to the holidays slowing down activity here.

The archive contains all opinions and comments collected for candidate nominations and their nomination results.

If you nominate an image here, please consider also uploading and nominating it at Commons to help ensure that the pictures can be used not just in the English Wikipedia but on all other Wikimedia projects as well.

Delisting an image

A featured picture can be nominated for delisting if you feel it no longer lives up to featured picture standards. You may also request a featured picture be replaced with a superior image. Create a subpage (use the "For Delists" field, below) and add the subpage to the current nominations section.

Please leave a note on the talk page of the original FPC nominator (and creator/uploader, if appropriate) to let them know the delisting is being debated. The user may be able to address the issues and avoid the delisting of the picture.

For delisting, if an image is listed here for ten days with five or more reviewers supporting a delist or replace, and the consensus is in its favor, it will be delisted from Wikipedia:Featured pictures. Consensus is generally regarded to be a two-thirds majority in support, including the nominator. Note that anonymous votes are generally disregarded, as are opinions of sockpuppets. However, images are sometimes delisted despite having fewer than five in support of their removal, and there is currently no consensus on how best to handle delist closures, except for one point: If the image to be delisted is not used in any articles by the time of closure, it must be delisted. If it is added to articles during the nomination, at least one week's stability is required for the nomination to be closed as "Kept". The nomination may be suspended if a week hasn't yet passed to give the rescue a chance.

Outside of the nominator, all voters are expected to have been on Wikipedia for 25 days and to have made a minimum of 100 edits. If necessary, decisions about close candidacies will be made on a case-by-case basis. As with regular nominations, delist nominations are given three extra days to run if started in December.

Note that delisting an image does not mean deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article(s).

Shortcuts

Featured content:

Featured picture tools:

Step 1: Evaluate

Evaluate the merit of a nomination against the featured picture criteria. Most users reference terms from this page when evaluating nominations.

Step 2: Create a subpage

For Nominations

To create a subpage of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates for your nomination, add a title for the image you want to nominate in the field below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Labrador Retriever) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

For Delists

To create a subpage for your delist, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

For Delist and replace

To create a subpage for your delist and replace, add a title for the image you want to delist/replace in the field below and click the "Create new delist nomination" button.

Step 3: Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

How to comment for Candidate Images

Write Support, if you approve of the picture. A reason is optional.
Write Oppose, followed by your reasoning, if you disapprove of the picture. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image. If your concern is one that can only be addressed by the creator, and if they haven't nominated or commented on the image, and if they are a Wikipedian, you should notify them directly.
You can weak support or weak oppose instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.
If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.

Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.

Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

How to comment for Delist Images

Write Keep, followed by your reasons for keeping the picture.
Write Delist, followed by your reasons for delisting the picture.
Write Delist and Replace if you believe the image should be replaced by a better picture.
You can weak keep, weak delist or weak delist and replace instead, so that your opinion will be weighed as half of a "full" opinion.
- To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

You may find the glossary useful when you encounter acronyms or jargon in other voters' comments. You can also link to it by using {{FPCgloss}}.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g., add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (e.g., Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor adjusted correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

Displays also differ greatly in their ability to show highlight detail. There are light grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display highlight detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings (probably reduce the contrast setting). Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal highlight detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet (roughly 75–150 cm) away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background. Note that the image must be viewed in original size (263 × 68 pixels) - if enlarged or reduced, results are not accurate.

Note that on most consumer LCD displays (laptop or flat screen), viewing angle strongly affects these images. Correct adjustment on one part of the screen might be incorrect on another part for a stationary head position. Click on the images for more technical information. If possible, calibration with a hardware monitor calibrator is recommended.

To see recent changes, purge the page cache.

FPCs needing feedback view edit

Current nominations

Philippine tarsier

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 15:38:16 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Philippine tarsier
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:38, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:04, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 21:57, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Asian golden weaver at nest

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 15:53:10 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image. Adds value to article. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Asian golden weaver
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 21:56, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Common imperial

Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2026 at 15:48:17 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cheritra freja, Cheritra
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:48, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 21:55, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:25, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Windsor City Hall

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 23:59:55 (UTC)

Reason: High technical quality, shows the entirety of the facade (which is difficult, as there was a fence right at my back).
Articles in which this image appears: Windsor City Hall, Windsor, Ontario
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is an excellent architectural photo. Nick-D (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jet injector

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 18:44:23 (UTC)

Reason: Period photograph of a medical device that is no longer as common as it once was. The photo has good contrast and depth of field, and shows the jet injector in use for high EV. I see minimal dust and no scratching, and the detail resolution is high; at full magnification, you can read the numbers on the injector gauge. The one technical shortcoming I see is small areas of blow-out, mostly on the man's forehead and the back of the woman's head. These are not ideal, but I don't think they matter much. The focus of the image is on the jet injector and the arm it's pressed against, both of which are well exposed.
Articles in which this image appears: Jet injector, 1976 swine flu outbreak
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Biology
Creator: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Support as nominator – Moonreach (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 21:16, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
comment neither article it is in has a source for Jet injections being used for influenza before 2014. While we are not technically in Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) territory if we want to run this on the main page we probably should be.©Geni (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- The source is fairly clear about usage, so I think RS criteria are met for the image. Blurb will be a different story, whomever schedules will have to worry about it.

That being said, the image is not the same as the original. I'll upload the TIF separately. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've added ALT1 - A wider crop without the drastic contrast edits. Support ALT1, as I feel like the crop makes the image feel more resolved. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Why is the tinting different? Moonreach (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't make any modifications to the file prior to uploading aside from a recrop and a light de-dusting. The current source is very clearly sepia toned. Could 8635 have referred to an alternative presentation before? Possibly. Could the uploader have made changes before uploading? Also possible. But given that two editors uploaded the same crop, I think it's a safe bet that the CDC changed its digital representation at some point. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:11, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Museu da Inconfidência

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 03:54:16 (UTC)

Reason: EV and HQ; the Tiradentes Square was where, on April 21, 1792, Tiradentes's head (place named after him) was publicly exposed after he (as leader of the Inconfidência Mineira, "Minas Gerais Conspiracy") was quartered, which later became a holiday throughout Brazil. In addition, the museum is considered a country's historic heritage site.
Articles in which this image appears: Museu da Inconfidência
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Otávio Nogueira

Support as nominator I fixed the tilt. – ArionStar (talk) 03:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Building is still tilted somewhat. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Moonreach (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The perception that the building is leaning is because it's on steep ground to the left, like the Leaning Tower of Pisa. See the verticals (the windows, for example), which are upright. ArionStar (talk) 04:52, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No, either the building itself is not level, or there is still tilting. The upper bannister is 25 pixels higher on the right side than on the left side (checked in Photoshop). The right wall is 5 pixels narrower at the top than at the bottom. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:15, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a perspective corrected crop above. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A tighter crop (even to remove some of the sky) would likely help here, by increasing the emphasis on the subject of the photo. Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Nick-D: Done. ArionStar (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too soon after previous nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The previous nomination was initiated in September 2026. Too soon? ArionStar (talk) 01:24, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chaukhamba from Boodha Madhyamaheshwar

Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2026 at 02:36:48 (UTC)

Reason: good quality, commons FP
Articles in which this image appears: Chaukhamba
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Landscapes
Creator: Abhishek.ghosh1984 (edited by UnpetitproleX)

Support as nominator – UnpetitproleX (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 04:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 6:48, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Moonreach (talk) 13:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Would oppose if oversaturation isn't corrected. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ceramic

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 21:07:58 (UTC)

Reason: EV and HQ
Articles in which this image appears: Ceramic, Vase, Ancient Maya art and Codex Style
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Others
Creator: Unknown (exhibited at the Met)

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 21:07, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:35, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
comment how sure are we that this thing is meant to be a vase?©Geni (talk) 23:59, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I'm also unsure of it's highest EV being in Ceramic... UnpetitproleX (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Cobbler repairing shoes in old workshop

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 15:33:34 (UTC)

Reason: QI, FP on Commons, winner 2025 Wiki Loves Folklore: Central & Eastern Europe & Central Asia
Articles in which this image appears: Shoemaking
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Culture and lifestyle
Creator: Petar Milošević

Support as nominator – Petar Milošević (talk) 15:33, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 19:09, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 22:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 13:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand the use of black and white here. The photo was taken last year, and B&W means its hard to understand what the man is doing. Nick-D (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This shows shoe repair of a modern pair of boots, not shoemaking, so is not relevant to the article, hence no EV. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:00, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Black-necked swan

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 11:52:48 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. High EV. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Black-necked swan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chiloe wigeon

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 11:33:12 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. High EV. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Chiloe wigeon
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support: a beautiful bird. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 11:58, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 19:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:10, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Golden birdwing female

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 11:26:50 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Troides aeacus, Troides
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 19:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:05, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Christie Question

Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2026 at 02:00:44 (UTC)

Reason: EV; FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Christie Question and Second reign (Empire of Brazil)
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Victor Meirelles

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 02:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Good EV, though not in artist's article. Is it really this dark? Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:06, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: yes, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victor Meirelles - Estudo para a Questão Christie, 1864.JPG. ArionStar (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing here. Perhaps you meant a different page? Moonreach (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Correct link is commons:Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victor Meirelles - Estudo para a Questão Christie, 1864.JPG — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Is it? That proves nothing... Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to oppose if you think it is too dark for FP. ArionStar (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Broad-tailed Grassbird (Schoenicola platyurus)

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 16:23:23 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Broad-tailed grassbird
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Tisha Mukherjee

Support as nominator – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 16:23, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 16:39, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 02:03, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I was surprised this was promoted unopposed on Commons. Not really very sharp. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
But it's display of tail is beautiful in this image. Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 08:07, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We're getting into aesthetics here, which are notoriously subjective, but I don't see anything eye-catching enough to make up for the un-sharpness Charles pointed out. The whole bird is a gradient from white to brown, and up close the tail feathers don't resolve into detail. Moonreach (talk) 18:54, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I agree that it could be sharper. But I think that it ticks the boxes, and the EV is good. We can replace it if we get a better image down the line. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Coris gaimard

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 10:01:45 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Infobox image.
Articles in which this image appears: Coris gaimard
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator: Diego Delso

Support as nominator – MER-C 10:01, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

African bush elephant

Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2026 at 09:52:48 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Infobox image.
Articles in which this image appears: African bush elephant
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Giles Laurent

Support as nominator – MER-C 09:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination! – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hellbus (talk) 22:22, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee ^talk 15:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – long nose ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:00, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support©Geni (talk) 00:00, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Celosia argentea in Philippines

Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2026 at 12:41:20 (UTC)

Reason: HQ, striking, and EV. I tried to make it less processed.
Articles in which this image appears: Celosia argentea, Borongan
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Creator: TheNuggeteer

Support as nominator – 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Parts of the plant are quite unsharp, and background is somewhat distracting.
Oppose I think it's a good idea to submit photos to FPC on Commons to get the photo quality endorsed, then we can assess EV here on enwiki. Here, bottom crop in too tight but tpp much space on left. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: Should I withdraw? 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:21, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm only one voter, so it's up to you. By all means wait and see other responses. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:02, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think evaluation on Commons is necessary. Photo quality can be judged here. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 13:04, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on that point. A thumbs-up from Commons is nice, but there's no need for their pre-approval. Moonreach (talk) 20:51, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Aye. Running past QIC might be useful as you're learning the ropes, but it's not necessary. I don't think I got my first Commons FP until ... 3 years after I started nominating at Wikipedia's FPC? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:55, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Northern pig-tailed macaque

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2026 at 17:53:26 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. Adds EV to article. FP on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Northern pig-tailed macaque
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support –UnpetitproleX (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 22:50, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:23, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:58, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 05:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Brown-chested martin

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2026 at 18:00:13 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image. High EV. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Brown-chested martin
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:25, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - some small sharpening halo/CA on the right of the bird can be overlooked. MER-C 18:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- New version uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 08:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Common mime

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2026 at 18:05:02 (UTC)

Reason: High quality large image of a butterfly in flight. FP on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Papilio clytia
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Insects
Creator: Charlesjsharp

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Moonreach (talk) 17:53, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 22:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture. Charlesjsharp, thank you for not overapplying AI sharpening to reduce the motion blur. I would consider selectively blurring the flower tips, like this. Jay Cubby 14:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:01, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:32, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Valerie Perrine

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2026 at 17:05:03 (UTC)

Reason: EV and HQ
Articles in which this image appears: Valerie Perrine
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: Rob Bogaerts / Anefo

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 17:05, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – ―Howard • 🌽³³ 17:14, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:22, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose looking at File:Valery op een balkon in Amsterdam, Bestanddeelnr 928-1233.jpg I don't think her hat should be that light. Her face may be in shadow the hat is not (in general the colour balance had me wondering what kind of film would produce that).©Geni (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Chilaquiles

Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2026 at 01:46:16 (UTC)

Reason: High technical quality, featured on Commons, stable in article for almost a year
Articles in which this image appears: Chilaquiles
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Creator: — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:46, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 00:21, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Lean oppose: I would prefer a more symmetrical composition without the cutlery. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 13:06, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:40, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
commentLooks like blown highlights on the fork and some of the cheese.©Geni (talk) 23:45, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations — to be closed

Nominations in this category are older than ten days and are to be closed. New votes will no longer be accepted.

Older nominations requiring additional input from users

These nominations have been moved here because consensus is impossible to determine without additional input from those who participated in the discussion. Usually this is because there was more than one edit of the image available, and no clear preference for one of them was determined. If you voted on these images previously, please update your vote to specify which edit(s) you are supporting.

Closing procedure

A script is available that automates the majority of these tasks: User:Armbrust/closeFPC.js

When NOT promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Not promoted| }} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
If the nominator is new to FPC, consider placing {{subst:NotpromotedFPC|Image name}} on their talk page. To avoid overuse, do not use the template when in doubt.

When promoted, perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Promoted|File:FILENAME.JPG}} --~~~~
Replace FILENAME.JPG with the name of the file that was promoted. It should show up as:

Promoted File:FILENAME.JPG

Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Add the image to:
- Template:Announcements/New featured content - newest on top, remove the oldest so that 15 are listed at all times.
- Wikipedia:Goings-on - newest on bottom.
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs - newest on top.
Add the image to the proper sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on top.
The caption for a Wikipedian created image should read "Description at Article, by Creator". For a non-Wikipedian, it should be similar, but if the creator does not have an article, use an external link if appropriate. For images with substantial editing by one or more Wikipedians, but created by someone else, use "Description at Article, by Creator (edited by Editor)" (all editors involved should be clear from the nomination). Additionally, the description is optional - if it's essentially the same as the article title, then just use "Article, by Creator". Numerous examples can be found on the various Featured Pictures subpages.
Add the image to the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures - newest on left and remove the oldest from the right so that there are always three in each section.
Add the Featured Picture tag and star to the image page using {{Featured picture|page_name}} (replace page_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the page_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/page_name). To add this template you most likely will have to click the "create" button on the upper right if the "edit" button is not present, generally if the image originates from Commons.
If an edited or alternative version of the originally nominated image is promoted, make sure that all articles contain the Featured Picture version, as opposed to the original.
Notify the nominator or co-nominators by placing {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:file_name.xxx}} on each nominator's talk page. For example: {{subst:PromotedFPC|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.
If the image was created by a Wikipedian, place {{subst:UploadedFP|File:file_name.xxx}} on the creator's talk page. For example: {{subst:UploadedFP|File:Blue morpho butterfly.jpg}}.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the April archive. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Page name}} from this page to the bottom of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Delist closing procedure

Note that delisting an image does not equal deleting it. Delisting from Featured pictures in no way affects the image's status in its article/s.

If consensus is to KEEP featured picture status, and the image is used in at least one article, perform the following:

Check that the image has been in the article for at least one week. Otherwise, suspend the nomination to give it time to stabilize before continuing.
Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Kept|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Optionally leave a note on the picture's talk page.

If consensus is to DELIST, or the image is unused (and consensus is not for a replacement that is used), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Delisted|}} --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Remove the image from the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs.

If consensus is to REPLACE (and at least one of the images is used in articles), perform the following:

Place the following text at the bottom of the WP:FPC/delist/subpage:
{{FPCresult|Replaced|}} with File:NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG --~~~~
Do NOT put any other information inside the FPCresult template. It should be copied and pasted exactly.

Replace NEW_IMAGE_FILENAME.JPG with the name of the replacement file.
Replace the {{Featured picture}} tag from the delisted image with {{FormerFeaturedPicture|delist/''Image name''}}.
Update the replacement picture's tag, adding the tag {{Featured picture|delist/image_name}} (replace image_name with the nomination page name, i.e., the image_name from Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/delist/image_name). Remove any no longer applicable tags from the original, replacement and from any other alternatives. If the alternatives were on Commons and no longer have any tags, be sure to tag the description page with {{missing image}}.
Replace the delisted Featured Picture in all articles with the new replacement Featured Picture version. Do NOT replace the original in non-article space, such as Talk Pages, FPC nominations, archives, etc.
Ensure that the replacement image is included on the appropriate sub-page of Wikipedia:Featured pictures and the appropriate section of Wikipedia:Featured pictures thumbs. Do this by replacing the original image with the new replacement image; do not add the replacement as a new Featured Picture.

Then perform the following, regardless of the outcome:

Move the nomination entry to the top of the "Recently closed nominations" section. It will remain there for three days after closing so others can review the nomination. This is done by simply moving the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the top of the section.
Add the nomination entry to the bottom of the archived delist nominations. This is done by simply adding the line {{Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image name}} to the bottom of the appropriate section of the archive.
If the nomination is listed at Template:FPC urgents, remove it.

Recently closed nominations

Nominations in this category have already been closed and are here for the purposes of closure review by FPC contributors. Please do not add any further comments or votes regarding the original nomination. If you wish to discuss any of these closures, please do so at Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates. Nominations will stay here for three full days following closure and subsequently be removed.

Crimson-breasted shrike

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2026 at 11:40:30 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Infobox image.
Articles in which this image appears: Crimson-breasted shrike
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: Giles Laurent

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:40, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination! – Giles Laurent (talk) 12:05, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 14:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 16:42, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:36, 24 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:41, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:161 Crimson-breasted shrike in Otjozondjupa Region Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:39, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Clementinum library

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2026 at 11:38:02 (UTC)

Reason: Unanimously featured on Commons. Illustrates multiple articles well.
Articles in which this image appears: Clementinum
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Creator: Václav Jiroušek

Support as nominator – MER-C 11:38, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – splendid hall ―Howard • 🌽³³ 10:30, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 13:31, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Moonreach (talk) 14:17, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 16:43, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Though I wish there were less distortion in the far left. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:42, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Hellbus (talk) 22:23, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Clementinum baroque library 2.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Stromatolite

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2026 at 16:58:55 (UTC)

Reason: High quality, stable lead image, featured on Commons
Articles in which this image appears: Stromatolite +7
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Sciences/Geology
Creator: Didier Descouens

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but it seems a little soft. Jay Cubby 18:53, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent choice --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:32, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 11:33, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 12:09, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — UnpetitproleX (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Stromatolithe Paléoarchéen - MNHT.PAL.2009.10.1.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:08, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Henry Kissinger

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2026 at 02:29:01 (UTC)

Reason: EV
Articles in which this image appears: Henry Kissinger, + ...
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: U.S. Department of State

Support as nominator Unusual portrait (without the US flag) but good restoration of a historically relevant person. – ArionStar (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – generic govt portrait. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 15:42, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given the breadth of Kissinger's career, there should be high quality images with much stronger EV than a standard black and white government headshot. Nick-D (talk) 00:18, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, there is a HQ 1982 color photo of him by Bernard Gotfryd, although it postdates his time as secretary of state, is currently a TIFF file (proscribed for display per c:COM:TIFF), has a thick black border at the edges, and may need minor restoration. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 12:43, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality. --Petar Milošević (talk) 09:49, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 03:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Mitchell Tenpenny

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2026 at 17:15:15 (UTC)

Reason: High quality image taken during a live performance.
Articles in which this image appears: Mitchell Tenpenny
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator: — Chris Woodrich (talk)

Support as nominator – — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:15, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per nom — UnpetitproleX (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 04:16, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination didn’t reach the necessary quorum for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 17:29, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ich bin ein berliner

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Mar 2026 at 14:59:09 (UTC)

Reason: HQ
Articles in which this image appears: Ich bin ein Berliner, West Berlin, Presidency of John F. Kennedy, Anti-communism.
FP category for this image: link to category (listed on the WP:FP page) that best describes the image
Creator: a work of an employee of the Executive Office of the POTUS.

Support as nominator – وسيم (talk) 14:59, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@وسيم, I uploaded a higher-res version and began to retouch it. Is it an improvement? Jay Cubby 18:37, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@JayCubby,

Yes, it is! Thank you so very much, the picture is much clearer now.❤️

وسيم (talk) 19:08, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Agree - much better. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment — There are a number of prominent vertical scratches. I'd support a restoration that removes them. (Conversely, I think the fisheye effect visible on the far buildings should be left alone, since that's an artifact of the camera itself.) Moonreach (talk) 14:21, 23 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
- As per above. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:42, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 15:17, 30 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Collard (plant)

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2026 at 03:48:07 (UTC)

**Original** – A bundle of collard greens

Reason: EV
Articles in which this image appears: Collard (plant), Sukuma wiki, List of U.S. state foods and List of soul foods and dishes
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Food and drink or Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
Creator: Evan-Amos

Support as nominator – ArionStar (talk) 03:48, 19 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 14:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 14:22, 21 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 11:42, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Giles Laurent (talk) 12:08, 22 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I dislike the background; the greens are not freshly cut and the red tie is distracking. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Collard-Greens-Bundle.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:30, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Suspended nominations

This section is for Featured Picture (or delisting) candidacies whose closure is postponed for additional editing, rendering, or copyright clarification.

Abbey Road

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2026 at 19:27:29 (UTC)

Reason: Featured on Commons, was opposed on quality reasons but would be a better fit here for obvious EV.
Articles in which this image appears: Abbey Road, The Beatles etc
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Entertainment
Creator: John Kosh (album design), Iain Macmillan (photograph)

Support as nominator – MER-C 19:27, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A high quality render of the The Beatles (album) cover would also make a good FP candidate. JJARichardson (talk) 20:03, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Extremely high EV, obviously, but I'm doubtful of the claim that this is out of copyright in the US given that the source cited on Commons is a random Ebay listing for LPs of the album. As the image was a commercial shot for the album and was used as its cover, a much better source seems necessary. Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
No deletion discussions so far (somehow), but image appeared to pass the Commons FA nom without anybody raising doubts about the PD status. If you personally have serious doubts it may be worth considering nominating for deletion. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 18:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Even within that listing, I don't see anything that says this image is out of copyright. Moonreach (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Moonreach: the rationale is that since the US publication of the cover was simultaneous with the UK publication, and the US cover did not bear a valid separate copyright notice for the cover, it is in the public domain in the US. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:44, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any direct evidence to the contrary, ~~so I won't vote against it,~~ but on a gut level I feel like this fails WP:SNOWBALL. I can't seriously believe that one of the most famous images connected to the most famous rock band was accidentally published without copyright. The problem is that I don't know what the image's official name was at the time it was taken, or who the copyright would have gone to (the photographer, the album designer, the record label, the producer?) which precludes me from looking it up in the copyright records. As a picture from 1969, it wouldn't have been subject to the 27-year renewal, which means any records (if they exist) would be in hard-to-search book records. Moonreach (talk) 22:52, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's also my concern here. The image may well be out of copyright in the US due to a stuff up by the record company or whoever originally owned the photo, but this needs to be properly established. Relying on a single Ebay listing as the source for being out of copyright doesn't seem OK for FP status. For instance, how can we be sure that the image hasn't been edited to remove the copyright notice?, how do we know for sure that it's actually a US edition of the album?, etc. Nick-D (talk) 23:48, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, if you either of you have concerns regarding copyright, you should nominate the image for deletion as there doesn't appear to have been a previous deletion nomination. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 14:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have concerns but I can't think of a way to verify them, short of Wikipedia getting a cease-and-desist order. I don't like that the permission is still an eBay listing; even if that were a trustworthy resource, which it's not, I couldn't find anything on there that said "the cover of Abbey Road is public domain." Additionally, the copyright tags that have been added since this nomination was made conflict with each other. One says copyright was in South Africa first, another says that it was in the UK and South Africa simultaneously. All of this feels dubious to me, I just don't think I can meet the burden of proof for a deletion nomination. Moonreach (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
For what its worth, on Commons the burden of proof for keeping a file typically lies with those supporting to keep the file in the first place. Per c:COM:PCP, even a "significant doubt" about the freedom of the file warrants its deletion. Personally I'm on the fence about the freedom of the album cover, and I don't feel confident in giving my opinion one way or the other about it. ―Howard • 🌽³³ 21:59, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated this for deletion at Commons. I hope that this leads to a strong source establishing that the image is out of copyright becoming available, but if not there are some risks around Commons hosting this image that need to be considered by the community there. Nick-D (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that, I've weighed in there. Moonreach (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Yann (talk) 09:49, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Gstaveeiffel314 (talk) 18:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ArionStar (talk) 00:19, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator on Commons. heylenny (^talk/_edits) 22:53, 26 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose – image seems quite pixelated looking closely. is this the best scan possible? ―Howard • 🌽³³ 23:51, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – RTSthestardust (talk) 03:56, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Hamid Hassani (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Due to my concerns over copyright as noted above. Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to the same concerns as Nick. I think the technical quality is acceptable, but I worry about legal exposure. Moonreach (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Postpone closure until the deletion request on Commons concludes. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:04, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]